https://lookaside.fbsbx.com/file/201...oqxXB5LBXNLKCA
Good intentions this should interest you and others.
not only do some of the surgeons in the article make the point that mesh needs to be studied more as wha
studied more long term to see what it does in
the human body but also as to the selection of
mesh, which ones work best and which ones
are better or worse for different subset of
patients.
The article mentions that there are over 300 types of meshes!!!
It boggles me how surgeons can quote reoccurences
percentages with mesh or pain percentages with
mesh so neatly when there are 300 different types.
How can mesh be so easily generalized form one to another to quote
these percentages and stats?
Just seems so obviously wrong and unethical.
No brainer every mesh implanted should
ne tracked and monitored.
only then will we get an idea of the true stats of pros and cons
of mesh as well as which ones have major issues and
design flaws.
So interested in dr. Towfigh’s And any others
feedback.
Good intentions this should interest you and others.
not only do some of the surgeons in the article make the point that mesh needs to be studied more as wha
studied more long term to see what it does in
the human body but also as to the selection of
mesh, which ones work best and which ones
are better or worse for different subset of
patients.
The article mentions that there are over 300 types of meshes!!!
It boggles me how surgeons can quote reoccurences
percentages with mesh or pain percentages with
mesh so neatly when there are 300 different types.
How can mesh be so easily generalized form one to another to quote
these percentages and stats?
Just seems so obviously wrong and unethical.
No brainer every mesh implanted should
ne tracked and monitored.
only then will we get an idea of the true stats of pros and cons
of mesh as well as which ones have major issues and
design flaws.
So interested in dr. Towfigh’s And any others
feedback.
Comment